Legal Opinion

Roman Catholic Diocese v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 7, 2003No. 1 CA-SA 03-0002PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 The Roman Catholic Diocese of Phoenix petitions this Court in a special action, challenging the trial court’s order that the Diocese produce certain documents in a grand jury proceeding. The Diocese argues that the trial court applied the incorrect legal standard to determine whether documents are protected by the attorney-client privilege. We find that the case is appropriate for special action review and accept jurisdiction. Because we conclude that the trial court properly interpreted Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13^1062(2) (Supp. 2002) by applying…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Readenour v. Marion Power ShovelArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. OlcavageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. Samaritan Foundation v. GoodfarbArizona Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Phillips v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. Roehrs v. Minnesota Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2005
  3. Slade v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. DitsworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API