Roehrs v. Minnesota Life Insurance
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ANDERSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter arises on Plaintiffs John Roehrs, M.D. and Jean Roehrs’ (collectively the “Roehrs”) Motion To Compel the production of certain documents from Defendants’ claim file, (document #88) Defendants oppose the production of the documents on the grounds that the documents are privileged from discovery pursuant to the attorney-client privilege. All parties have previously consented in writing to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (document # 24)
After considering the subject motion, Defendants’ Opposition To Motion…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- Admiral Insurance Company v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Ingram v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- B&F Jacobson v. AcuityCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
- Briggs v. AdelDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Briggs v. AdelDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.