Legal Opinion

In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 26, 2002No. 1-CA-MH 01-0010PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant seeks relief from an order of commitment for involuntary mental health treatment. We address issues concerning (1) the documents that must be served with a petition for court-ordered treatment under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 36-533(B) (Supp.2001), and (2) the qualifications for acquaintance witnesses pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-539(B) (1993).

Pertinent Facts and Procedural History

¶2 On September 6, 2001, an Application for Involuntary Evaluation of appellant was filed pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-520 (1993). By statute, an application for evaluation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered PersonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. City of Casa Grande v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Mental Health No. MH 95-0074Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Koller v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Matter No. MH 862-16-84Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. In re MH 2006-000749Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State v. LewandowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API