In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant seeks relief from an order of commitment for involuntary mental health treatment. We address issues concerning (1) the documents that must be served with a petition for court-ordered treatment under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 36-533(B) (Supp.2001), and (2) the qualifications for acquaintance witnesses pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-539(B) (1993).
Pertinent Facts and Procedural History
¶2 On September 6, 2001, an Application for Involuntary Evaluation of appellant was filed pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-520 (1993). By statute, an application for evaluation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered PersonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Casa Grande v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Mental Health No. MH 95-0074Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Koller v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Matter No. MH 862-16-84Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- In re MH 2006-000749Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. LewandowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.