State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. Olcavage
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, we are asked to decide whether persons who have received specific training in phlebotomy, 1 who are certified in phlebotomy by two national certification agencies, and who have performed numerous blood draws are legally “qualified” to perform blood draws for purposes of determining the alcohol concentration or drug content in a suspect’s blood under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 28-1388(A) (Supp.2000). A Scottsdale City Court judge ruled that phlebotomists were not qualified persons under the statute unless they drew blood under the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. TrostleArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. NihiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Roman Catholic Diocese v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Slade v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.