Legal Opinion
Slade v. Schneider
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 28, 2006No. 1 CA-SA 05-0129PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OROZCO, Judge.
¶ 1 Duane Slade and Guy Williams (Petitioners) challenge the trial court’s partial denial of them Motion to Compel the Arizona Corporation Commission (Commission) to disclose: (1) the identities of all the investors who had made specific allegations against them; and (2) information and documents gathered in the course of the Commission’s investigation of their alleged securities violations. The trial court found that Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 44-2042.A (2003) (the Confidentiality Statute) protected from disclosure information about those investors whom…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Home Indemnity Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lane Powell Moss and Miller, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. OlcavageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 2 v. Phoenix Employee Relations BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Blake v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Green v. NygaardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- In re MH 2005-001290Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Johnson v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Hormel v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.