Legal Opinion

Readenour v. Marion Power Shovel

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1986No. 18224-PRPublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFeldman, Justice

Robert and Catherine Readenour (plaintiffs) petition us to review a decision of the court of appeals which reversed a judg ment entered in plaintiffs’ favor and against Marion Power Shovel, a division of Dresser Industries, Inc. (defendant). Readenour v. Marion Power Shovel, 149 Ariz. 454, 719 P.2d 1070 (App.1985).

We concur in the result reached by the court of appeals but granted review because we disagree with its conclusions concerning the construction and application of A.R.S. § 12-686, which limits the admission of evidence of post-sale modification in a product liability action. Because…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lubbock Feed Lots, Inc., and Lockney Cooperative Gin v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Ault v. International Harvester Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. KiperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API