State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Schneider
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNOW, Judge.
¶ 1 This special action concerns whether the testimony before the grand jury of former Glendale City Attorney Richard Flaaen disclosed communications protected by the attorney-client privilege. 1
¶ 2 The State obtained criminal indictments against five Glendale city officials— four city council members and the city clerk — who are the real-parties-in-interest in this special action. The grand jury issued the indictments after hearing the testimony of several witnesses, including Flaaen. The trial court determined that Flaaen improperly disclosed communications protected by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re Bruce R. Lindsey (Grand Jury Testimony)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. SeidelArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION United States of America, Movant-Appellee, v. John Doe, Interested-Party-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Alexander v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. DitsworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- In Re: Mh2019-004895Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Sanchez v. AinleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.