Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Sweeney

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1915No. Sac. No. 2191PublishedCited by 52 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff sued to quiet title to the following described real property situate in the city of Sacramento: “The South fifty (50) feet of the West fifty-seven (57) feet of lot number Ten (10) in the Block bounded by C and D and Twelfth and Thirteenth streets of said City.” He claimed under a deed from his mother, Margaret Doseher (defendant’s testate), bearing date October 28, 1902. The answer denied plaintiff’s interest under any deed or through any other instrument save the will of his mother, whereby he was devised a certain interest in remainder, subject to an estate for years. The answer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Follmer v. RohrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Black v. SharkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Whitlow v. DurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Ohanneson v. LambrinidouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API