Legal Opinion

Whitlow v. Durst

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1942No. Sac. 5433PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

In July, 1938, Charles and Carrie Durst separated and executed a property settlement under which she transferred to him her interest in two insurance policies upon his life. He died a month later leaving a will bequeathing the proceeds of the policies to his sister and executrix in trust for his mother.

Two actions were brought on the policies. In the first the executrix seeks to recover from Mrs. Durst the proceeds of one policy paid to her by the insurer. The second is brought by the other insurer in interpleader, who paid the amount of the policy into court. In both actions the executrix…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Donahue v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Sprague v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API