Legal Opinion

Decou v. Howell

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1923No. L. A. No. 7307PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEA WELL, J.—

Plaintiff, Helena DeCou, initiated this action in the superior court of Riverside County primarily to compel conflicting claimants to interplead and litigate between themselves their several claims and rights to receive payments due and to become due from her under a contract for the purchase of a nine-acre tract of land of the value of about four thousand dollars, situate in said Riverside County, which she had made with the record owner thereof, Elizabeth E. Sitton, since deceased. The parties claiming ¡an interest in the subject matter, all of whom are defendants, subsequently…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Donahue v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Masterson v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. In Re the Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Whitlow v. DurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Isenberg v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API