Black v. Sharkey
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior-Court of Plumas County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action of ejectment in which the judgment was in favor of the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
The complaint is in the most general form, alleging plaintiff's ownership and right of possession, and an ouster and withholding of possession by defendant; and the answer is a specific denial of all allegations of the complaint, except as to the withholding of possession.
James Sharkey, uncle of defendant, was the owner of the demanded premises on May 18, 1878, and plaintiff claims title under him by a deed of conveyance of that date, which purports to be an absolute bargain and sale…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Knolls v. . BarnhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Denis v. VelatiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Stewart v. StewartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Donahue v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.