Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Parks

California Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1902No. L.A. No. 1187PublishedCited by 45 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

The suit was brought by the plaintiff, who is widow of the defendants’ intestate, to assert her claim to the two lots of land described in the first and third counts of the complaint,' and to an undivided half of the lot described in the second count, and for recovery of possession of the same. Judgment was rendered in her favor for an undivided half of the lot described in the third count, and against her as to the other half, and as to the lots described in the first and second counts. She appeals from so much of the judgment only as relates to the causes of action set out in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheelwright v. WheelwrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Black v. SharkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Denis v. VelatiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Harris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Donahue v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Partee v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API