Legal Opinion
State, City of Eden Prairie v. Liepke
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 31, 1987No. C1-86-1736PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant John Liepke was charged with city zoning ordinance violations. His motion to dismiss the complaint was denied, and he was later convicted. On appeal he claims the city had approved his construction project and therefore was equitably estopped from alleging that the project violated its zoning ordinances. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
John Liepke owns a two-acre residential lot in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The lot contains the house in which Liepke and his family live and a detached garage. In September 1984 Liepke presented plans to Lowell Thone, an Eden Prairie…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Kmart Corp. v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In re the Amended Administrative Penalty Order to Westling Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Department of Human Services v. Muriel Humphrey ResidencesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.