Legal Opinion
The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 30, 1946No. 34,184PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 24 N.W.2d 244. Appeal from a judgment permanently restraining defendant from preventing plaintiffs from constructing a driveway over a public sidewalk and cutting the curb in connection therewith.
In 1942, defendant, operating under a home-rule charter, enacted a zoning ordinance, No. 326, which has been in force at all times since its enactment. The provisions thereof which are pertinent to this decision are as follows:
"Section 7. C2 Commercial Districts. In a C2 Commercial District the following uses are permitted:
"A use permitted in R1, R2, R3 Dwelling Districts and C1…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- City of San Antonio v. Pigeonhole Parking of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
- Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.