Legal Opinion
State v. Holmberg
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 26, 1996No. C5-95-1164, CX-95-1578PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge. *
Operators of adult bookstores appeal convictions for violations of the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances (MCO). They argue that the restrictions on adult bookstore windows set out in MCO § 540.410(g) are overbroad and improperly regulate the time, place, and manner of speech. The ordinance is a valid regulation on the time, place, and manner of speech. Minneapolis is not estopped from prosecuting the bookstore owners. The evidence supports the convictions, and we affirm.
FACTS
This appeal consolidates two separate appeals from criminal convictions for violations…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Excalibur Group, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Z.J. Gifts D-2, L.L.C. v. City of AuroraColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Di Ma Corp. v. City of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. MirelesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.