Legal Opinion
Department of Human Services v. Muriel Humphrey Residences
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 28, 1989No. CX-88-1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appeal from an order of the Commissioner of the Department of Human Services which required appellant to repay $32,-617.33. We reverse.
FACTS
The federal Medicaid or Medical Assistance program is established under Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1396 et seq. (1983). The purpose of the program is to provide medical and related care to needy persons. The Medicaid program is jointly funded by the state and federal governments, and its administration is subject to both state and federal law and regulations.
Minnesota’s Medical Assistance program is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Amended Administrative Penalty Order to Westling Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Zahler v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Appeal of O'BoyleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re the Temporary Immediate Suspension of the Family Child Care License of StreckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.