Legal Opinion
Van De Loo v. Van De Loo
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1984No. C6-83-1443PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal of the division of property in a marriage dissolution. The trial court treated the proceeds of appellant’s personal injury settlements and the assets purchased with the proceeds as marital property subject to division. Appellant objects to this division and the finding that undue hardship would result if the proceeds were treated as nonmarital property. Appellant also challenges the trial court’s reservation of the spousal maintenance issue. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 26, 1983, the parties’ marriage of 32 years was dissolved. The children of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Unkle v. UnkleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Doucette v. WashburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Landwehr v. LandwehrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.