Legal Opinion
Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 25, 1997No. C5-96-1353PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this employment termination case, Phong Thi Doan argues the evidence does not support the district court’s findings and those findings do not support the conclusion that she was discharged for nondiscriminatory reasons. Doan also claims the district court abused its discretion in denying her motion to amend her complaint, erred in directing a verdict on her tort claims, and denied her a fair trial by failing to appoint an interpreter sua sponte. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Phong Thi Doan is a woman of Vietnamese descent who came to the United States in 1975. Doan worked…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Elkharwily v. Mayo Holding Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage BankingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Kelly v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Conant v. City of HibbingDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000