Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The district court granted summary judgment against Dianne Hoover’s employment-discharge claims. We affirm summary judgment on her claims for failure to reasonably accommodate disability and for reprisal because the submitted evidence fails to establish legally essential elements. We also affirm summary judgment on Hoover’s negligent-supervision claim because it is preempted by the Minnesota Human Rights Act. The evidence is, however, sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact on discriminatory discharge, and we reverse and remand on that claim but dismiss one…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Combs v. Plantation PatternsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage BankingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Pierce v. Rainbow Foods Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Potter v. Ernst & Young, LLPCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001