Legal Opinion

Kelly v. City of Minneapolis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 22, 1998No. C0-97-1206PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellants Virginia Kelly and Antoinette Deyo allege numerous trial errors in their civil action against respondents, the City of Minneapolis, the police chief, and four Minneapolis police officers. They claim error in (1) the trial court’s imposition of official immunity to bar two police officers’ liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress; (2) evidentiary rulings; (3) defense counsel misconduct; (4) jury instructions; (5) special verdict form; (6) court rulings on their motion for a posttrial Schwartz hearing; and (7) findings as contrary to the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Greiner v. City of ChamplinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Johnson v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Kelly v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API