Legal Opinion
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 23, 1979No. 48172, 48335PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Plaintiff Gerald Haagenson, owner of an automobile and a pickup truck, was insured by defendant, National Farmers Union Property and Casualty Company, under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Act, Minn.St. c. 65B. Plaintiff was seriously injured under unusual circumstances giving rise to a claim against defendant under the no-fault coverage of both vehicles; and, in addition, plaintiff (with his wife, plaintiff Jeanette Haagenson) made claims for damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress by nonpayment of his claims, and punitive damages.
A jury found that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Engeldinger v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.