Legal Opinion
Conant v. City of Hibbing
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 8, 2000No. CIV. 99-303 RLEPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the consent of the parties, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), upon the Motion of the Defendant City of Hibbing (“Hib-bing”) for Summary Judgment.
A Hearing on the Motion was conducted on June 1, 2000, at which time Hibbing appeared by Larry C. Minton, Esq., and the Plaintiff Albert James Conant (“Co-nant”) appeared by Kurt B. Glaser, Esq. For reasons which follow, Hibbing’s Motion for Summary Judgment is…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Simonson v. Trinity Regional Health SystemDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002