Legal Opinion

Randall v. Allen

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1919No. Sac. No. 2,588PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

On January 14, 1911, a corporation, by name the Eucalyptus Timber Company, being the owner of a certain quarter-section of land in Kings County, contracted in writing to sell the south half of it to the appellants, I. N. and E. E. Allen. The purchase price was four thousand eight hundred dollars, of which one thousand six hundred dollars was paid at the time, one thousand six hundred dollars was to be paid November 1, 1912, and the remaining one thousand six hundred dollars November 1, 1913. The contract provided that the purchaser might take immediate possession.

The Allens neglected to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Smith v. YuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Fair v. StevenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Dreyfus v. HirtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Schumacher v. TrumanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gates Rubber Co. v. UlmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Davis v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Keese v. BeardsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bessho v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Spadoni v. MaggentiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API