Legal Opinion

Fair v. Stevenot

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1866PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Eleventh Judicial District, Calaveras County. The Court gave judgment in favor of plaintiff for six sevenths, and in favor of defendants for one seventh of the quartz ledge, the property sued for. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.

The plaintiff appealed from that portion of the judgment, which was entered in favor of the defendant for one seventh of the premises sued for. This appeal and the appeal designated as No. 369 are taken from different portions of the same judgment. The first appeal was heard upon the judgment roll alone, and this cause is presented on a statement on appeal filed by the plaintiff, to which is attached a stipulation, by which it is agreed, among other things, that the cause “may be argued on the foregoing statement.”. The causes have not been consolidated in this Court,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williamson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Tuttle v. Jackson ex dem. HillsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  3. Grimstone v. CarterNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Dutton v. WarschauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Hunter v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Unger v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. West v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Thompson v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API