Dreyfus v. Hirt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gibson, C.
Ejectment; judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals on the judgment roll, which contains a bill of exceptions.
*623Defendant admitted by his answer that the plaintiff was the owner of the premises in dispute, and that he, defendant, had possessed and occupied them, and averred that his possession and occupation thereof were pursuant to two' leases granted to him by the grantor of plaintiff. From the findings it appears that while one Hope was the owner in fee of 290 acres of the rancho Las Positas, in the county of Santa Barbara, he made two leases to the defendant. The first was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thompson v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Smith v. YuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Fair v. StevenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Palmtag v. DoutrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Worthington v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
3Cited by18 opinions
- Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Gates Rubber Co. v. UlmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Whitney v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Brichetto v. RaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Randall v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.