Legal Opinion
Bessho v. General Petroleum Corp.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1921No. L. A. No. 6116PublishedCited by 17 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. L. Weil, Fredericks & Hanna, J. H. Ardis and W. S. Knott for Appellants. Evans & Pearce, Evans, Abbott & Pearce and W. E. Evans for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
We hereby adopt the following from the opinion of the district court of appeal of the first appellate district as correctly stating the facts:
“This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in an action to recover damages for the destruction of certain flowers and rose-cuttings being grown by said plaintiffs upon a certain tract of land consisting of about five acres owned by the defendant Sarah E. Ralph and her five children as tenants in common, which lands had been made the subject of two leases, under the first of which the plaintiffs claimed the right to the exclusive…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scheerer v. CuddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Randall v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Schwartz v. McQuaidIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Whyler v. Van TigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Cox v. DevinneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
3Cited by17 opinions
- Robertson v. Peters (In re Weisman)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Gates Rubber Co. v. UlmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Atlantic Oil Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.