Legal Opinion
Davis v. Thayer
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1980No. Civ. 57769PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAIDIG, J. *
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside an entry of default and a judgment predicated thereon.
On September 28, 1978, plaintiff and respondent, Jo Anne Davis, filed a complaint for restitution and damages against Charles E. Thayer and his mother Eileen D. Willette, defendants and appellants, doing business as Camarillo Gold & Silver Exchange, a partnership. The complaint, which concerned the sale of a partial interest in a contract for the purchase of gold, alleged that defendant Thayer had made nu merous false representations to plaintiff, without any…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- South Bay Chevrolet v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Kendall v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- National Diversified Services, Inc. v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.