Legal Opinion

Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 7, 2008No. Civil Action 04-1991 (RMU)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting in Part and Denying in part the Individual Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the New York Life Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The remaining defendants in this lengthy litigious saga set before this court a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment. Individuals who are current or former members of the board of directors of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America 1 (“PhRMA”) and members of the PhRMA retirement committee (collectively the “individual…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Constien v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Olivo v. ELKYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Marcin v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API