Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in part the Individual Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the New York Life Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The remaining defendants in this lengthy litigious saga set before this court a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment. Individuals who are current or former members of the board of directors of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America 1 (“PhRMA”) and members of the PhRMA retirement committee (collectively the “individual…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Constien v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Olivo v. ELKYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Marcin v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.