Legal Opinion
Olivo v. ELKY
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 20, 2009No. Civil Action 09-00298 (HHK)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs Richard Olivo, John Hawkins, and Norman Boone are current and former employees of the National Museum of Women in the Arts (“Museum”). They bring this action against the Museum, the Museum’s Defined Contribution Plan (“Plan”), and Plan administrator Barbara Elky, alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1500 (2006), and asserting a common law negligence claim.
Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Commissioner v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Connie M. Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Incorporated, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Amp Incorporated, Formerly Known as Carroll Touch Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Healey v. AbadieDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Moyle v. Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit PlanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Soland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Haines v. General Pension Plan of the International Union of Operating EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.