Legal Opinion
Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 10, 2009No. Civil Action No. 04-1991(RMU)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
After years of battling, the plaintiff requests that the court grant her leave to file a second amended complaint to clarify her claims, which stem from alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. The remaining defendants, current or former members of the board of directors of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America1 (“PhRMA”) and members of the PhRMA retirement committee…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. JaneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Kruger v. Cogent Communications, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Easter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Andresen v. Intepros Federal, IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.