Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1944No. 33,685PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. Their suit was “for an injunction restraining defendants * * * from interfering” with their use of a driveway located upon a lot owned and occupied by defendants Clarence O. Dunn and wife. Plaintiffs own and occupy lot three, which lies north of defendants’ lot eight. (The lots do not run in a straight line north and south but at a slight angle, northwesterly and southeasterly, but in our discussion we shall refer to the directions as north and south.) They acquired by deed conveying lot three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Hoverson v. HoversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Johnson v. HeglandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. State v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Johnson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dozier v. KrmpotichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Hartman v. Blanding's Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API