Aldrich v. Dunn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. Their suit was “for an injunction restraining defendants * * * from interfering” with their use of a driveway located upon a lot owned and occupied by defendants Clarence O. Dunn and wife. Plaintiffs own and occupy lot three, which lies north of defendants’ lot eight. (The lots do not run in a straight line north and south but at a slight angle, northwesterly and southeasterly, but in our discussion we shall refer to the directions as north and south.) They acquired by deed conveying lot three…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Hoverson v. HoversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Johnson v. HeglandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- State v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Johnson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dozier v. KrmpotichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Hartman v. Blanding's Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970