Johnson v. Olson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OLSEN, Justice.
The plaintiffs bring this action to have it adjudged that they are the owners of an easement, by prescription and adverse user, for the purpose of travel through a five-acre tract of land owned by the defendant, upon and along a line and route described in the complaint. After trial the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law to the effect that the use of said line of travel across defendant’s land was by permission and license only, revocable at the will of the defendant, and that plaintiffs had no easement in or through defendant’s land along the route described.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Johnson v. SkillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Naporra v. WeckwerthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- City of Hutchinson v. WegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Ingelson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Larue v. KosichArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Aldrich v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944