Legal Opinion

Hoverson v. Hoverson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1943No. 33,529PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

In this action for partition or sale under Minn. St. 1941, § 558.01 (Mason St. 1927, § 9524), plaintiffs prevailed. The only dissatisfied party is defendant Benjamin A. Hoverson, who appeals through his special guardian, Frank P. Heil, from an order denying his blended motion for amended findings or a new trial. Only that part of the order denying a new trial is properly here.

The property involved is a Blue Earth county farm of 320 acres owned and used as a unit over a period of more than half a century. As a matter of fact, the home quarter section (SW% of section 2,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Township of Canosia v. Township of Grand LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Prohl v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Nordlund v. DahlgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Hoerr v. HoerrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Hoverson v. HoversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. American Automobile Insurance v. MollingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Koenigs v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Swogger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API