Hartman v. Blanding's Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Defendant Blanding’s Inc. appeals from a judgment and an amended judgment determining that plaintiff, Samuel M. Hartman, has acquired a prescriptive easement for a driveway and granting a permanent injunction against interference with his use of the driveway.
Plaintiff brought the action for an injunction against defendants 1 to prevent them from obstructing a driveway from U. S. Highway No. 10 to the front entrance of plaintiff’s build ing. The driveway involved is claimed by right of prescription. A temporary injunction was granted and the case thereafter was tried on the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dartnell v. BidwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
- Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Davis v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924
- Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Peppin v. W.H. Brady Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Fritz v. Arnold Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Pierce v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Larson v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.