Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Blanding's Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1970No. 42253PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Defendant Blanding’s Inc. appeals from a judgment and an amended judgment determining that plaintiff, Samuel M. Hartman, has acquired a prescriptive easement for a driveway and granting a permanent injunction against interference with his use of the driveway.

Plaintiff brought the action for an injunction against defendants 1 to prevent them from obstructing a driveway from U. S. Highway No. 10 to the front entrance of plaintiff’s build ing. The driveway involved is claimed by right of prescription. A temporary injunction was granted and the case thereafter was tried on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dartnell v. BidwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  2. Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Davis v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924
  5. Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Peppin v. W.H. Brady Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Fritz v. Arnold Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Pierce v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Larson v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API