Romans v. Nadler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
The parties are the record owners of adjoining residential properties in the city of St. Paul. Plaintiffs’ lot is number 2 and defendants’, which lies westerly thereof, is number 3 in a certain block. Defendants appeal from the judgment (1) adjudging plaintiffs the owners “by prescription” of three portions of lot 3 presently to be mentioned and of an easement to go upon lot 3 or so much thereof as is reasonably necessary and at such times as may be reasonably necessary for the purpose of placing ladders and other equipment thereon in connection with the putting on and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Keats v. HugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Whittaker v. StangvickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Dean v. GoddardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Seymour, Sabin & Co. v. CarliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Burling v. LeiterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Hebert v. City of Fifty LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Duenow v. LindemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- McCarty v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.