State v. Riley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 7 N.W.2d 770. This is an appeal from an order denying the appellant's motion for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law or for a new trial. An order denying a motion for amended findings or conclusions is not appealable. The court's denial of such a motion amounts to findings to the contrary. Herman v. Kelehan,212 Minn. 349, 3 N.W.2d 587; Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Ry. Employees, 187 Minn. 202, 244 N.W. 817. When such a motion is blended with a motion for a new trial and is denied as a whole, the order denying the new trial is appealable. This is another way of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Olsen v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Sheffield v. CliffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Johnson v. HeglandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seabloom v. KrierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Hoverson v. HoversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- State v. PahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State v. QuinnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Droege v. BrockmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.