Legal Opinion

Dozier v. Krmpotich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1949No. 34,725PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in an action to determine adverse claims adjudging defendant to have an easement of way by prescription across their land.

The legal questions to be decided are:(1) Whether acquiescence of the owner in the use of an easement of way across his land without more shows that the use, claimed to be adverse, was in fact permissive;(2) Whether a grant of an easement of way during the prescriptive period (that is, before the statute of limitations has run) by the owner of land to one claiming such easement of way by prescription interrupts the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dartnell v. BidwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  2. Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Davis v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ehle v. ProsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Brown & Brown of MT, Inc. v. RatyMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Moore v. HenricksenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Alstad v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API