Legal Opinion

Pease v. District Court in and for the Ninth Judicial District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 2, 1985No. 84SA415PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

In this original proceeding, petitioner, Jeffrey Marcus Pease, seeks a new preliminary hearing on charges of possession and use of cocaine and sexual assault. Petitioner also seeks to disqualify the District Attorney for the Ninth Judicial District to appoint a special prosecutor. We issued a rule to show cause why the petition should not be granted. We make the rule absolute to disqualify the district attorney. The court is equally divided on the issue of a new preliminary hearing. Accordingly, the rule to show cause is discharged and the trial court’s denial of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. People v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Riboni v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR TENTH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. People v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR THIRD JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. MacRanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. PalomoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API