Legal Opinion
Fognani v. Young
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 14, 2005No. 04SA303PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
Victor and Anna Marie Fognani (“the Fog-nanis”), are plaintiffs in a malpractice action pending in Pueblo County District Court. The Fognanis were represented in that action by John D. Fognani, Esq. (“Mr. Fogna-ni”) and Fognani Guibord & Homsy, LLP (“FGH”). The Fognanis endorsed their son, Mr. Fognani, a named partner at FGH, to testily as a fact witness in their suit against Robert S. Young, M.D., and Southern Colorado Clinic, P.C. (collectively “Dr. Young”). Upon Dr. Young’s motion, the trial court consequently disqualified Mr. Fognani and *1270FGH from representing the Fognanis in the lawsuit.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Comden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- General Mill Supply Company, Manual Rotenberg and Milton Rotenberg, Plaintiffs v. Sca Services, Inc., Hale and DorrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Kubin v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Stamp v. Vail Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Ferrer v. OkbamicaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Vinton v. VirziSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- In re People v. TafoyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Northbrook Digital, LLC v. Vendio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.