Legal Opinion

Riboni v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR TENTH JUD. DIST.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 11, 1978No. 28115PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan

The petitioner Riboni brought this original proceeding pursuant to C.A.R. 21 seeking relief in the nature of mandamus. He asks that we order the respondent trial court to reverse its ruling denying his motion for appointment of a special prosecutor, or, that we order the case dismissed. We issued a rule to show cause and having concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, we now discharge-the rule.

Riboni was charged with two counts of vehicular homicide 1 based on allegations that he was the driver of a truck involved in a fatal collision. Prior to trial, Riboni’s counsel, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. Wheeler v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF ADAMSSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. People v. HauschelColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR THIRD JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. JOHNTSON v. EmersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ReevesNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. State v. WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. PalomoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API