Legal Opinion

People v. MacRander

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 6, 1992No. 91SC416PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn

In People v. Macrander, 817 P.2d 579 (Colo.App.1991), the court of appeals decided two questions concerning jury selection in a criminal prosecution. The court held that a prospective juror whose son was a deputy district attorney on the staff of the elected district attorney who initiated the prosecution was subject to a challenge for cause under section 16-10-103(1)(b), 8A C.R.S. (1986), as being related within the third degree “to any attorney of record.” The court also held that the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s challenge for cause was prejudicial error requiring a new trial…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. People v. NovotnySupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API