Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Palomo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 10, 2001No. 01SA68PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

In this original proceeding pursuant to C.AR. 21, we determine whether the district court properly exercised its discretion by granting the defendant's motion to recuse the Thirteenth Judicial District Attorney's Office (district attorney) and the Capital Crimes Unit of the Colorado Attorney General's Office (Capital Crimes Unit) from further participation in this case after finding an appearance of impropriety. We issued a rule directing the respondent, Cruz Palomo, to show cause why the district attorney and Capital Crimes Unit, should not be permitted to prosecute a criminal case against…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Stauffer v. KarabinColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. People v. DISTRICT COURT, IN & FOR SECOND JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. People v. StevensColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. People v. VigilColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. JimenezColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API