People v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR THIRD JUD. DIST.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
The People petitioned this court for relief in the nature of prohibition to prevent an acting district judge in the Third Judicial District from dismissing the prosecutor from a pending case. C.A.R. 21. We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule absolute.
The prosecutor in question represented the People before a grand jury in 1976. In the course of investigations into activities of Ernest U. Sandoval, District Attorney for the City of Trinidad, the prosecutor asked certain questions of Sandoval. The responses to these questions formed the basis for a subsequent indictment of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- United States v. MaloneyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- People v. MazzaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- People v. HauschelColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Marrs v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. MorleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. PeerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Pease v. District Court in and for the Ninth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.