Legal Opinion

Murdoch v. Murdoch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1965No. Appeal, 373PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

Henrietta C. Murdoch filed a complaint in equity against John P. Murdoch, brother of her deceased husband, alleging that he had fraudulently induced her to exchange her 49% of the stock of the John P. Murdoch Company for 49% of the stock of a newly-to-be-formed corporation with only a part of the assets of the John P. Murdoch Company. After answer filed by the defendant, and reply thereto filed by the plaintiff, followed by the taking of depositions, the respective attorneys entered into negotiations which resulted in a settlement whereby $20,000 was to be paid to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Emery v. Third Nat. Bank of Pbg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Kadilak WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Sterling Electric & Furniture Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Minnich v. RiveraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Barson's & Overbrook, Inc. v. Arce Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Hopewell v. HendrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. In Re: Condemnation by PennDOT, of Right-of-Way for SR 1032, Section B02, in the Borough of Rochester: Cronimet Corp. v. PennDOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API