Legal Opinion

Minnich v. Rivera

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1986No. 161 E.D. Appeal Docket 1984PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the evidentiary standard in a paternity trial, proof by a preponderance of the evidence, as prescribed by statute, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 6704(d), violates the due process clause of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution.

The Act of April 28, 1978, P.L. 202, No. 53, as amended by the Act of October 5, 1980, P.L. 693, No. 42, as further amended by the Act of December 20, 1982, P.L. 1409, No. 326, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 6704 abolished criminal paternity proceedings and the evidentiary burden of proof beyond a…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. R. v. Com., Dept. of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Rivera v. MinnichSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. D'ALESSANDRO v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. State v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API