Legal Opinion

Emery v. Third Nat. Bank of Pbg.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1932No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The plaintiff relying, as he says, on defendant’s misrepresentations invested $10,000 in the Highland Coffee Company and lost it when the company became bankrupt. Plaintiff brought suit against the defendant, hereinafter referred to as the bank, for “compensatory and punitive damages,” and recovered $10,000 with interest or a total of $12,000. Defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. was refused.

The assets of Highland Coffee Company, a bankrupt Pennsylvania corporation, were purchased by the bank, and a new corporation called “The Highland Coffee Company” was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morse v. HutchinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. N. C. Antle & Bro. v. SextonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Estes v. OdomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Miller v. Central Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Mahaffey v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Scaife Co. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Umbelina v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. John N. Wittekamp v. Gulf & Western, Inc. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co. And Wickes Manufacturing John N. WittekampCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Porreco v. PorrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Highmont Music Corp. v. J. M. Hoffmann Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API