Legal Opinion

Hopewell v. Hendrie

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 1989No. 698PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The issue presented for decision is whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to strike off a discontinuance in this wrongful death and survival action where the discontinuance was mistakenly filed by plaintiff-appellant’s counsel of record without the knowledge of appellant or of the attorney who was actually litigating the case, the petition to strike the discontinuance was filed within thirty days of appellant’s discovery of the error, there has been no demonstration of prejudice to the defendants-appellees and the statute of limitations on appellant’s cause of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. T. W. Phillips Gas and Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Consolidated National Bank v. McManusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Kyung Ha Jung v. St. Paul's ParishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Pesta v. BARRONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Murdoch v. MurdochSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re: Condemnation by PennDOT, of Right-of-Way for SR 1032, Section B02, in the Borough of Rochester: Cronimet Corp. v. PennDOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Tosi v. KizisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Vartan v. ReedCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Guzman v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Nastasiak v. Scoville Enterprises, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API