Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1970No. Appeal, 253PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Eagen,

This is an appeal from an order entered below “refusing” without evidentiary hearing a petition to strike or open a judgment.

The facts necessary to a decision are undisputed and may be summarized as follows:

On April 12, 1967, Laura M. Cameron was injured when a “pop” bottle manufactured by defendant Cott Corporation and distributed by Cott Bottling Company of Pittsburgh (for convenience these two defendants are hereinafter collectively referred to as Cott) exploded at the check-out counter of a supermarket of defendant The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A. &…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Linett v. LinettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Melnick v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Baumgartner v. WhinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Washington County Controller's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Mountain City Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Malakoff v. Zambar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Interiors v. Wall of Fame Management Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Loppert v. WindsorTech, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
  4. General Electric Credit Corp. v. SlawekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Advance Building Services Co. v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API