Legal Opinion

In Re: Condemnation by PennDOT, of Right-of-Way for SR 1032, Section B02, in the Borough of Rochester: Cronimet Corp. v. PennDOT

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 2016No. 1358 C.D. 2015PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge ROBERT SIMPSON.

Cronimet Corporation (Landowner) petitioned to reopen, an eminent domain case in which the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT) obtained a temporary construction easement, over its property pursuant to the Eminent Domain Code' (Code), 26 Pa.C.S, §§ 101-1106. Previously, Landowner and DOT settled the .case. However, after receiving just compensation and discontinuing the action, Landowner sought to recover additional damages under the Code for destruction of property that occurred while DOT occupied the easement. Landowner argued DOT owed a duty to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rothman v. FilletteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Elser v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Deets v. Mountaintop Area Joint Sanitary AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. GoldCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Fulmer v. White Oak BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. J.M. McMaster and M.E. McMaster, h/w v. The Township of BensalemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. C.A. Conley, an Individual v. County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. C.F. Hughes v. UGI Storage Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Franconi Enterprises, Inc. v. Kingston BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. H. & A.M McKenna v. Com. of PA, DOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API