Barson's & Overbrook, Inc. v. Arce Sales Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant contends that the lower court erred in granting appellees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings.
In May, 1966, appellant Barson’s and Overbrook, Inc. t/a City Line Delicatessen and Restaurant (hereinafter Barsons) purchased smoked fish from appellees Arce Sales Corporation (Arce) and Acme Smoked Fish Co. (Acme). Barsons sold this fish to its patrons. Following these sales a number of Barsons’ customers became ill with salmonella poisoning. Seven lawsuits were then instituted against Barsons by the salmonella sufferers. Barsons joined Arce and Acme as additional…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Cameron v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Melnick v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Baumgartner v. WhinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Sale v. Ambler (Emmett)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gail Esther Frank, a Minor by Her Parents and Guardian, Shirley J. Frank v. Volkswagenwerk, A. G. Of West Germany v. Rosaria Ann Muckin and Donald P. Miller, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Frank v. Volkswagenwerk, A. G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Heyl & Patterson, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Kaiser v. 191 Presidential Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Oakmont Presbyterian Home v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.